Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu

АНАЛИ ПРАВНОГ ФАКУЛТЕТА

144

провести тако да води рачуна о интересима продаваоца и ььеговим евентуалним упозорењима. Пропуштање дужне пажње с ма које уговорне стране имало би утјецаја на одмјеравање висине накнаде трошкова изазваних отклањањем. Права купца наведена у Опћој узанци бр. 154, према томе, не би требало знатније мијењати, осим што сматрамр исправнијим предложено преформулирање права на тражење испуњења уговора. Остале предложена коректуре омогућиле би еластичније регулирање положаја како купца тако и продаваоца, што би по нашем мишљењу одговарала потребама савременог привредног промета.

Јакша Барбић

SUMM A R Y Rights of the Buyer in Case of Defective Goods The author discusses the choice of rights, the buyer is given by the General Usages of Trade in case of delivery of defective goods. According to the General 154 and provided that an appropriate daim to the seller in respect of defects determined on the goods has been duly made, the buyer is authorised and given the option to: a) cancel the contract and place the goods delivered at the disposai of the seller; b) insist on the performance of the contract and place the goods delivered at the disposai of the seller; c) daim a réduction in price proportionately to the re duced value of the goods delivered; d) insist on the seller to remove the defects within a reasonable time if the defects are such as to permit their removal. In all cases the buyer may daim domages. But, the buyer shall not hâve the right to refuse the goods if he has disposed of goods delivered on his own behalf and for his own account, or if the différence in quality does not exceed the limit of customary tolérance, unless the contract shall contain the provision „without tolérance” or similar stipulations (General Usage No. 155). The buyer may choose one of the quoted rights through his déclaration without even demanding the décision of a court or an agreement of the seller. The author compares this décision of the General Usages of Trade with décisions given for the very same question by laws of: Great Britain (Sale of Goods Act, 1893), France (Code civil), Italy (Codice civile, 1942), German Démocratie Republic (Law on Contracting System in a Socialistic Economy of GDR), German Federal Republic (BGB), Sweden (Law of Purchasing and Barter of Movable Properties), Switzerland (Obligations Law), USA (Uniform Commercial Code), USSR (Fundamentais of Civil Legislation), then General Conditions-Commecon, Uniform Law on the International Sale of Goods, General Conditions for Delivery of Goods between Yugoslav and Polish Enterprises, and as well some standard contracts and general conditions of the ECE OUN. In virtue of ail these laws the author concludes that the choice of rights offered to the buyer by the General Usages of Trade is indeed broad enough, but is not always limitless, though exactly this could be deduced from the General Usage No. 154. At the same time author makes a proposai to slightly modify some of these rights.