Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu

281

УГОВОРИ И ЗАКОН О ОБЛИГАЦИЈАМА

ных договорах высказывается мнение, что их пока не следует включать в число указанных. Особое внимание посвящается феномену делового и общественного вступления в различные договоры, в последнее время в нашей действительности имеющего весьма широкое применение и стремящегося стать одной из существенных ее характеристик. Приводятся разные виды вступления в подобные договоры, их содержание, субъекты и пока что недостаточность позитивно-правовых решений. Отстаивается точка зрения, что кроме чисто деловых соглашений, остальные следует включать не в Кодекс об обязательствах, а в Кодекс об объединенном труде.

SUMMARY The Types of Contracts that Should be Included in the Law of Contract Some questions relative to the denomination of contract of the future Law of Contract are discussed in the article. The author firmly argues for the uniform codification with respect to the dilemma of the dual or uniform codification of the contract relations of the civil law and contract relations of the economic law. He also supports the opinion that, in effect, for the regulation of contract requisites the changes of the social system are not of decisive importance. Rataining the system of the production of goods and participating very intensively in the world market, Yugoslavia should keep in essential matters all the customary and generally accepted types of contract, and consequently in the future law great changes are not necessary. The author concludes that the special part bearing upon the obligations should be stipulated by retaining the rules of the former civil codes, the valid general trade usances, and the legal rules created through the judicial practice without neglecting the modem solutions of the comparative legislations and law, or the influence of Yugoslav social system and the third industrial revolution upon some institutes in this field. The author particularly tries to find criteria for the legal classification of contracts. He is considering the question of eventual denomination (exchange, service, bequest, etc.) in relation to the existing types of contracts. With respect to the new, now unclassified contracts, several criteria are cited for their classification, but in particular a frequency, validity, and relative stability of the given type, as well as the necessity of the social influence upon the development of these relations, of avoiding disputes owing to the defectiveness of contract stipulations and, finally, eventual necessity of the society to protect itself from speculations and other deviations accompanying concluding and performance of contracts. In the part dealing with the classification of new contracts, the question of the need to regulate contracts on building, engineering, lease, and some other co tracts such as: rent a car, bond, contract on board, etc., is discussed. The author firmly supports the standpoint that building contracts should be seggregated from the contracts on services, and be stipulated as a separate class of contracts. He has no definite standpoint as to the engineering contracts, while for the other new contracts he points that they slould not be included in the classified ones for the time being. A special attention is devoted to the phenomenom of the business and social conventions, that lately have been spreading in the Yugoslav practice, tending to become its characteristical features. Different types of these conventions are exposed, as well as their content, their subjects and scanty legal solutions. Excepting the purely business contracts, the author finds that other contracts should be stipulated not in the Law of Contracts, but in the Code of Labour Association.